Be Careful What (Fed Rate Cuts) You Wish For

Jeff Buchbinder | Chief Equity Strategist

Last Updated: December 08, 2023

Market-watchers have been intensely focused on the Federal Reserve (Fed) this year. Recently, they’ve mostly opined on when the first rate cut might be coming and, generally, assuming that a rate cut would be good for stocks. It could be good, but LPL Research's analysis peels back the onion to help make an important point. Once the cut comes, typically the Fed has gone too far and recession is near (or already started). Further, markets tend to get jittery ahead of the cut, suggesting investors right now might be better off rooting for “higher for longer.”

An examination of Fed rate cycles since the 1970s (table below) reveals that investors don’t have much to look forward to when looking at how stocks do during the first six months following the first Fed rate cut. Keep in mind that the sample size is relatively small, with only nine rate cycles studied. It is also worth noting that the time from the first rate hike to the first rate cut has more than doubled since 1985 as business cycles have generally lengthened.

While average gains don’t appear great (2% over the subsequent six months and 5–6% over the next 12), they aren’t bad either. The dispersion is where this gets more interesting. During challenging economic environments such as the early 1980s, early 2000s, and pre-Great Financial Crisis, stocks suffered mightily after the Fed's easing cycle began. Simply put, performance varies quite a bit across these periods.

We observe the same thing when analyzing the period between the final rate hike and the first rate cut, with mixed returns; in addition, negative returns outnumber positives.

S&P 500 Performance During Fed Rate Cycles

Final Fed Rate Hike	First Fed Rate Cut	Return between period	Six Month from Rate Cut	One Year From Rate Cut	Number of Days
5/1/1974	7/1/1974	-6.7%	-18.4%	10.7%	61
3/3/1980	4/1/1980	-9.2%	23.8%	33.7%	29
5/8/1981	6/1/1981	0.6%	-4.8%	-15.7%	24
8/21/1984	10/2/1984	-2.5%	10.4%	12.5%	42
2/24/1989	6/5/1989	12.2%	8.6%	13.9%	101
2/1/1995	7/6/1995	17.8%	11.3%	18.7%	155
5/16/2000	1/3/2001	-8.1%	-8.4%	-13.5%	232
6/29/2006	9/18/2007	19.4%	-12.4%	-20.6%	446
12/19/2018	8/1/2019	17.8%	9.2%	10.8%	225
	Average	4.6%	2.1%	5.6%	146
	Median	0.6%	8.6%	10.8%	101
	% Positive	44%	56%	67%

Source: LPL Research, FactSet 12/08/2023

Disclosures: All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The modern design of the S&P 500 Index was first launched in 1957. Performance before then incorporates the performance of its predecessor index, the S&P 90.

The Fed will cut rates because it worries monetary policy is too restrictive for a weakening economy. The central bank’s goal remains a soft landing, and their spotty track record in achieving that goal does not mean a hard landing is necessarily in the cards. Some things have already broken, by the way, including Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic Bank. And many think the U.S. economy already experienced a recession with the two straight GDP declines in the first half of 2022 (it was a technical recession, not an official one).

Today, consumer and corporate balance sheets are in great shape, with many corporate executives having already prepared for recession. And don’t forget, the cause of the presumed recession, high inflation, has sharply reversed. Bottom line, if a recession comes in 2024, it will likely be too mild to disrupt the market meaningfully.

So now 135 days into the rate pause—assuming no additional hikes are forthcoming—be careful what you wish for. Higher for longer and a “muddle through” economy without cuts might be best for stocks in 2024. More on these topics in our Outlook 2024: A Turning Point, due out on December 12 on lpl.com.

Important Disclosures

This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, please consult your financial professional prior to investing.

Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk.

Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

This material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.

Unless otherwise stated LPL Financial and the third party persons and firms mentioned are not affiliates of each other and make no representation with respect to each other. Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services.

Asset Class Disclosures –

International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.

Municipal bonds are subject and market and interest rate risk and potentially capital gains tax if sold prior to maturity. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.

Preferred stock dividends are paid at the discretion of the issuing company. Preferred stocks are subject to interest rate and credit risk. They may be subject to a call features.

Alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involve special risks such as leveraging the investment, potential adverse market forces, regulatory changes and potentially illiquidity. The strategies employed in the management of alternative investments may accelerate the velocity of potential losses.

Mortgage backed securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment, extension, market and interest rate risk.

High yield/junk bonds (grade BB or below) are below investment grade securities, and are subject to higher interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks than those graded BBB and above. They generally should be part of a diversified portfolio for sophisticated investors.

Precious metal investing involves greater fluctuation and potential for losses.

The fast price swings of commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor's holdings.

Securities and advisory services offered through LPL Financial, a registered investment advisor and broker-dealer. Member FINRA/SIPC.

Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency | Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value

For Public Use – Tracking: 514097

Jeff Buchbinder

Jeff Buchbinder, CFA, provides the top-down view of the stock market for LPL Financial Research. He has over 25 years of experience in equities.