How Markets React When the Fed Cuts Rates — Context Is Everything

LPL’s Chief Economist Jeffrey Roach explores how equity markets have historically responded to Fed rate cuts — and why the context behind those cuts matters more than ever.

Last Edited by: LPL Research

Last Updated: August 06, 2025

LPL Research Street View image
Video Type

Jeffrey Roach (00:00):

Hi, I am Jeffrey Roach, Chief Economist for LPL Financial, and in this latest edition of the Street View podcast, we'll address the question, how do stocks historically behave when the Fed starts cutting rates?

Jeffrey Roach (00:13):

Okay, so let's set the stage. In the past several months, investors have taken an absolute rollercoaster ride with rate cut expectations. As we recently wrote in our Weekly Market Commentary, markets were expecting the Fed to cut at least four times earlier this year. Now, fast forward a few weeks, expectations fell to just one and a half cuts, and then things changed after the weak jobs report. So let's briefly discuss rate cuts and then talk about what happens in the markets. So the Federal Reserve's decision to cut interest rates is often viewed as a pivotal moment for financial markets. So while rate cuts during recessions tend to coincide with market stress and declining equity prices, the story is marketably different when the Fed eases policy during non-recession periods, typically categorized as growth scares or normalization phases. Historical data reveal, the S&P 500 has generally performed well following rate cuts outside of recessions. In episodes during the 80s and 90s, not accompanied by a formal recession,

Jeffrey Roach (01:16):

The index posted positive returns in the months following the first rate cut. So first, during growth scare periods, where the Fed cuts rates in response to slowing, but still expanding economic activity, the S&P 500 has shown particularly strong performance. These rallies reflect investor optimism that monetary easing will successfully stabilize growth without tipping the economy into contraction. Now, second, in normalization scenarios where the Fed reduces rates after a period of tightening to maintain balance, well, the S&P also tends to rise, albeit more modestly. These periods often reflect recalibration of policy rather than a response to crisis, which markets interpret as a constructive backdrop for equities. So the key takeaway is this, the context of the rate cut matters. When cuts are proactive rather than reactive, aimed at sustaining expansion rather than rescuing a faltering economy, markets tend to respond favorably. For investors, understanding the motivation behind Fed policy shifts is crucial to interpreting their likely impact on equity performance. Well, that's all for now, but please follow us on social media and take care.

 

In this Street View podcast, Jeffrey Roach, Chief Economist at LPL Financial, explores how equity markets typically respond when the Federal Reserve begins cutting interest rates. While rate cuts during recessions often coincide with market stress, historical data shows that cuts made during non-recession periods — such as growth scares or policy normalization — tend to support equity market gains. The S&P 500 has historically performed well following proactive rate cuts aimed at sustaining economic expansion. Understanding the context behind Fed policy decisions is key to interpreting their impact on market behavior.

You may also be interested in:


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors or will yield positive outcomes. Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. Any economic forecasts set forth in the podcast may not develop as predicted and are subject to change.

References to markets, asset classes, and sectors are generally regarding the corresponding market index. All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and do not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services. LPL Financial doesn’t provide research on individual equities. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.

All index data is from FactSet or Bloomberg.

Municipal bonds are subject to availability and change in price. They are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values will decline as interest rates rise. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply. If sold prior to maturity, capital gains tax could apply.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.

This Research material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. 

Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency

Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed

Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations

May Lose Value

 

RES-0005029-0725 | For Public Use | #779833 (Exp. 08/26)