Global Central Banks Start Synchronized Easing

Dr. Jeffrey Roach | Chief Economist

Last Updated:

On this day we remember those who lost their lives in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. We will never forget. 

Key Points 

  • It’s not about “if” but “how much” the Federal Reserve (Fed) will cut rates at the upcoming meeting. The European Central Bank (ECB) is also expected to cut as central banks sync up. 
  • The most likely scenario is the Fed will cut by 25 basis points in the upcoming meeting and reserve the potential for more aggressive action later this year if the job market deteriorates further.  
  • As we highlighted in our September 9 Econ Market Minute, investors should expect interest rate volatility as the Fed adjusts policy.  
  • Immediately following the inflation release, yields on the 10-year Treasury spiked over the inconclusive longer-term outlook on rates, growth, and employment.  
  • In recent days, the yield curve disinverted as the economy normalizes. 

Global Central Banks Begin Synchronized Easing 

The European Central Bank (ECB) meets this week to discuss markets and monetary policy, and we expect the ECB to lower rates by a quarter of a percent as they coordinate a global easing cycle with the Fed and most other central banks. Christine Lagarde, President of the ECB, began cutting rates in June as the euro area showed signs of weakening growth earlier this year. The U.S. dollar will likely feel downward pressure as the Fed attempts to move in lock step with its European counterpart. 

Weaker domestic growth and decelerating inflation metrics have put unique pressure on Treasury yields recently. Recently, the yield on the 2-year Treasury fell below the 10-year yield as markets expect — perhaps irrationally — that the Fed will cut aggressively despite some stickiness to inflation.  

Yield Curve Often Disinverts Before Recessions

Fed Cuts Are the Catalysts

Spread between 2-year and 10-year treasury yields, the upper bound of the federal funds rate, and yield of 10-year treasury yields from 1988 to 2024.

Source: LPL Research, Federal Reserve Board 09/10/24

Investors often talk about the recession signals from an inverted yield curve. Many debate the validity of this signal, especially since the curve has been inverted for quite a while. Perhaps the debate should focus on the drivers behind the inversion and — more importantly — the drivers behind the disinversion. 

In discussing rules, signals, and theories, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell recently corrected market observers that these recession warnings are statistical regularities, not “an economic rule where it’s telling you something must happen.” 1

As it relates to the spread between 2-year and 10-year Treasury yields, the disinversion is a likely combination of three important factors. First, early signs of slowing economic growth have put downward pressure on yields. Second, markets are anticipating the Fed to aggressively cut rates. And third, the Treasury market continues to be a safe haven for global investors concerned about the greater risks internationally. 

So what about the periods of disinversion? Note the mid-1990s. The Fed was able to cut rates with softer inflation and higher labor force participation, but the economy did not fall into recession because real disposable incomes were growing, giving consumers the ability to spend.  

A Word of Warning 

The U.S. economy did not fall into recession in the mid-to-late 1990s. The U.S. grew by 4.4% in 1997, 4.5% in 1998, and 4.8% in 1999, and domestic equity markets rallied. Growth was much stronger than expected given the international crises. But, international markets were experiencing something different. In 1997 and 1998, the Asian financial crisis impacted international economies and spread to Eastern Europe and Latin America. The Fed responded with more rate cuts, easing some of the global pressures on domestic businesses and consumers. Part of the issues of that time were in the banking system and exposure to excessive hedge fund leverage, illustrated most famously by the collapse of the Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) hedge fund. 

Summary 

LPL Research anticipates higher volatility among both bonds and equities during this period of global uncertainty and the softer growth outlook. Therefore, LPL’s Strategic and Tactical Asset Allocation Committee (STAAC) maintains its neutral stance on equities while watching for potential opportunities to add equities on weakness. We expect volatility to remain elevated over the next few months, and believe a better entry point back into the longer-term bull market will likely emerge. 

1 https://www.federalreserve.gov/mediacenter/files/fomcpresconf20240731.pdf

Jeffrey J. Roach profile photo

Dr. Jeffrey Roach

Jeffrey Roach guides the overall view of the economy for LPL Financial Research and has over 20 years of experience in investing and economics.